Lifting Voters' Voices: Dodd vs. Romney
By Michael Whitney, 12/05/2007 - 6:35pm
Chris Dodd and Mitt Romney's campaigns sent similar messages to their supporters yesterday. Both fundraising emails highlighted donors' notes to the campaign, but the ways each campaign asks for money are almost polar opposites. Dodd's message highlights people who gave $100 or less and suggests a $25 donation, while Romney's message encourages people to forward the notes to your "entire rolodex," and asks for donations of at minimum $80. Join me to take a look at both of the messages.
Following Friday's forwarded fundraising message from Dodd's campaign, sent before all the "edits" could be incorporated, Tim Tagaris takes a moment to share some of the notes of support from small-dollar Dodd donors. Here's some examples from the message, titled "What did you say?":
For months I've filled your email box with two types of messages:
What Chris Dodd is up to on the trail, and how you can meaningfully
support those efforts.
But lest you think it's just us talking at you, we get all kinds of
responses and do our best to read each and every one of them.
Here are a few more messages from supporters.
* Steven from Chandler, AZ writes, "Thanks for standing up for our Constitution."
* Vincent from Burbank, CA adds, "Good luck in Iowa. I hope that you surprise everyone and win."
* Janice from Germantown, TN included the following message with her
$25 contribution, "We need an electable candidate that supports the
constitution. Chris Dodd can do that."
All in all, Tim highlights 12 supporters, and includes their first name, location, and how much each donated - from $25 up to $100. Supporters are then asked to donate $25 to Dodd's campaign.
The message from Mitt uses the same basic principle, but takes a completely different approach to how to ask for money. Mitt Romney's online team jumped into the plain-text fundraising fracas yesterday, sending their supporters a forwarded email from a donor named Josh Sato. Spencer Zwick, Mitt Romney's finance director, writes that Josh Sato supports Mitt Romney and wrote in, "I’m feeling anxious…Iowa is just one month away! I emailed the campaign to see what I can do to help." Mitt's campaign's had an answer: a "One Million Dollar Media Victory Fund" to run ads in early primary states. Josh Sato, appreciative of Zwick's response, sent a message "to his entire rolodex" encouraging people to donate to the media fund.
About that media fund. Here are the four ways that you and your rolodex can contribute:
I don't know the demographics or giving trends of Romney's email list,
so they know what they are capable of raising and how much to ask to
get there. But this is an unusually high ask that is not outlined in
the original email. Also, is it so much to ask that you can get a DVD
for $80?
This message was a unique design for the Romney campaign, which usually uses a banner that says "Mitt Romney" at the top of every message, but that was absent in this email. You can see what the plain text version looks like at Politickr. The message has three parts - first, a one paragraph intro that is supposed to be written by Spencer Zwick, Romney's finance director:
This weekend, a contributor emailed asking how he can specifically help our campaign in the final days before the first caucuses and primaries - and now he's forwarding my response to his entire rolodex. Please follow his lead. The clock is ticking, and Mitt is counting on us.
The second part is supposed to be written by Josh Sato, the supporter:
The race in Iowa and the other early states is neck and neck. I’m feeling anxious…Iowa is just one month away! I emailed the campaign to see what I can do to help. See their response below, and please consider joining me by supporting the Media Victory Fund today at MittRomney.com/MediaFund.
And then after all of that is the original fundraising message written by Spencer Zwick, explaining what the Media Fund is and why it's important to donate.
I do not think this was an effective use of the forwarded-plain-text-email fad. First, this is Zwick's first appearance as a character in Romney's online presence, which is different from other candidates' use of this tactic. There is usually one known character, either the candidate or the online campaign person who usually communicates with supporters. Second, neither of the "personal notes" on top of the original email are signed, and you really have to study the email to figure out what's going on - and that's not a good way to bring in support for a million-dollar media fund.
There are good reasons why Dodd and Romney are going about fundraising from two different points: Dodd is trailing most candidates in most polls, while Romney is struggling to stay on top, fighting off both Huckabee and Giuliani. He needs a million-dollar media fund, even if he has to make some big asks to build it. Dodd, on the other hand, can free up his campaign to be creative and innovate new approaches to communicating with supporters and lifting up donors - if there was more on the line for Dodd, there'd be bigger asks.
Clinton vs. Obama fundraising e-mails
Thanks for the good article. On a similar vane, I received e-mails this week from both the Clinton and Obama campaigns trying to take advantage of the rhetoric between the two campaigns. Here are my observations on the differences between the e-mails.
Clinton's e-mail arrived in my inbox at 9:32:05 a.m. EST titled, "Dead Heat In Iowa." The e-mail mentioned that they have a goal of raising $1.25 million by the end of the week, "to ensure that we have the resources needed to win." There is no direct mention of any other Democratic challenger, just one sentince that says, "in Iowa, we're in a dead heat." The rest of the e-mail was a pretty generic fundraising appeal, personalized with my name when appropiate. The graphic is of a calendar showing "31 days left," a reference to when the Iowa caucuses will be held. Looking on her website today, there is no reference to how much was raised towards the goal, nor can I find it quickly.
Obama's e-mail arrived in my inbox at 2:03:18 p.m. EST titled, "When Hillary Attacks." The e-mail started out mentioning that Obama was now leading in a poll conducted by the Des Moines Register. The e-mail went on to mention, "less than 12 hours after the poll results were released, the Clinton campaign launched multiple frantic, baseless attacks against Barack Obama." The e-mail continued requesting, not a specific dollar goal be reached, but they get 10,000 donors within 48 hours. There were no graphics with this e-mail. When I went to Obama's web site, there was a counter showing how many people had responded to the fundraising drive. Granted, it isn't Howard Dean's bat, but it was well done. As I write this, the graphic is still there, but I don't think they've updated it since the 48 hours ended.
I just find it interesting how the campaigns are reacting differently yet similarly to the same event.
In the interest of full disclosure, I contributed to both campaigns, but I have contributed more to Obama than I have to Clinton.