I wonder when people are going to wake up to the unethical tactics used by Moveon. They are a movement of angst and anger. They are emo. My first exposure to Moveon was from a guy who sold magnets claiming the magnets could cure most illnesses! I also doubt the claim of 3.2 members. Oh, I am certain they have about that many email addresses, but how many contacts are duplicated and are outdated but still part of the count? However, Moveon can not be underestimated. They have easy access to the media and are skilled at exploiting an issue to get the greatest emotional impact out of it. You can only carry out such tactics against people for only so long before they figure out your scam. However, more experienced people are going to be turned off by their questionable tactics. Others, such as myself, find their choice of issues to be uncompelling and unworthy of attention.
By Joshua Levy, 01/31/2008 - 1:59pm
Be sure to check out Ari Melber's piece in the Nation about MoveOn's Democratic primary, in which they're asking their 3.2 million members to vote for their preferred Dem.
...if MoveOn does manage to unite "as a progressive community around one of these candidates," as Executive Director Eli Pariser explains in a new e-mail, its activists could play a pivotal role in this race. There are over a million and half MoveOn voters in Super Tuesday states. The group boasts 575,000 web activists in California alone--about 9 percent of turnout for the state's 2004 presidential primary. It has one of the largest and most active donor lists in American politics, which could help finance a long delegate hunt for either candidate. And among many Democratic activists and primary voters, it offers a credential that both candidates covet: a commitment to aggressive, forward-looking politics that will end the war and confront the corrupt GOP establishment. In short, MoveOn is a political "brand" that could blunt lingering Democratic concerns that Obama's post-partisanship is too nice for the inevitable battles ahead, or validate Clinton's argument that she is the toughest, most partisan Democrat in the race.
The results will shed light on the thinking of progressives now that John Edwards is out of the race. Should be interesting.
more from Joshua Levy's blog | login or register to post comments
Recent blog posts
- Google Grabbed Most of Obama's $16 Million in 2008
- #inaug09: Twitter Vote Report, the Next Generation
- Sell Obama stimulus and create new transparency era by democratizing data
- Obama Pushes Citizen Service Out of the Nest
- SoapBlox Burnout Points to Vulnerability in Left's Infrastructure
- PdF's 2009 Top 50 Political Blogs
- Daily Digest: CTO Watch -- The Rising Stock of California PhDs
- CES and Tech Politics
- Small Tents vs. Big Networks: Recreating the GOP
- Daily Digest: Party Hopefuls Vying for Tech Cred
Recent comments
- As if my taxes were not enough?
2 hours 55 min ago - already working together to fix
7 hours 52 min ago - Obama CTO from Silicon Valley
22 hours 57 min ago - Where McCain and the organized parted ways
23 hours 3 min ago - olur mu sizce
1 day 2 hours ago - Whether there will be more
1 day 13 hours ago - very interesting article....
1 day 13 hours ago - thank you
1 day 18 hours ago - By merging its organizing
2 days 28 min ago - The numbers
2 days 2 hours ago

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
I ought to mention that Mike
I ought to mention that Mike Gravel is sorely missing from this poll, although MoveOn did poll for him before.