Great thoughts, Allison! Rather than pile on to what is missing, I went ahead and broke out a few of the key (and easy) opportunities they have to engage in what is becoming the social web...
By Allison Fine, 03/31/2008 - 1:55pm
[Cross-posted at A. Fine Blog]
Al Gore just announced a new campaign to $300 million climate change campaign. It’s a very slick website called We Can Solve the Climate Crisis, or We for Short.
At the risk of being totally un-PC for We, I have some problems here (and I’m not talking about the shock of seeing the phrase, “Nobel laureate former Vice President Al Gore” — didn’t I just know him as boring Al?). So, here are difficulties that I have with this:
1. I wonder how much of that $300 million has gone into this too-slick web site. I’ve been wondering for a while where the first social media-driven global advocacy campaign was going to come from, and I imagined that it would come from young people using their social networks and Twittering and poking one another around the globe to press for drastic climate change. I was hoping that it wouldn’t look like an online version of RealSimple magazine.
2. This is probably an extension of the point above, but in addition to the slick feel of the sight are the creepy “real” people talking to me. I think I’d feel better if they were just actors rather than real people who are called “presenters”. I have no idea what that means. I really wish this site felt more like craigslist and less like Disney world.
3. In a truly disempowering sense, the We campaign already has it all figured out — and all we, the robotic consumer people who don’t look as attractive as the “presenters” have to do is click here, buy this, give them our name and email address and the names and email addresses of our nearest and dearest and the problem will be solved! Hey, ad exec. people making millions of dollars, we regular people may have some ideas of what to do, who to talk to, how to organize ourselves that hasn’t been focused grouped and put into pale colors yet!
I’ve got to get off this site, it’s making me really cranky!
Recent blog posts
- RNC Files FEC Complaint Against Obama Inspired by an Email Smear?
- Reprise of $1 Million "Obama Minute," but now with Interactive Times Square Billboard
- Ask Sarah Palin: CA Dems' Interactive Billboard Goes Live [UPDATED]
- Whisper in Brokaw's Ear
- Social Security Administration Blocking Voter Registration (cont'd)
- Daily Digest: Twitter's on Palin vs. Biden Like Otters on Oysters
- Top 5 Reasons You Won't Be Able To Vote
- Hashtags: The New New Way to Organize the World
- Obama Releases iPhone App, but Why? [UPDATED]
- Daily Digest: Plutocracy-Killing People-Empowered Politics?
Recent comments
- Targeting is Scary, without permission
2 days 20 hours ago - Add #readthebill #bailout #factcheck to the list
3 days 18 hours ago - even if this had cost them $$
3 days 19 hours ago - Outreach to the creative class
3 days 20 hours ago - What do you mean why?
3 days 20 hours ago - Dodd was/is on Twitter
3 days 23 hours ago - How to improve ballot initiatives
4 days 23 hours ago - House now throttling inbound constituent communications
5 days 17 hours ago - "seeing political memes" goes public
1 week 15 hours ago - Why keep the president?
1 week 22 hours ago

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Some answers
1) Probably far less than 0.1% of $300 Million. Judging by the URL structure and some of the tools, it's a site by Blue State Digital using their existing website suite. Then, the only additional costs would have been producing those Flash videos, which would be somewhere in the low five figures. The $300 Million is being used for buying ads on the big networks during primetime.
2) The people in the videos are identified as Presenters for the Climate Project -- the several hundred people Gore has trained to give his presentation:
http://www.theclimateproject.org/aboutus.php
3) The site definitely does encourage self-organization:
http://www.wecansolveit.org/content/community/