- Defense Department Voting Assistance Program Draws Congressional Fire
- Daily Digest: Obama as Clinton Redux, in More Ways Than One
- Change.gov Swaps Traditional Copyright for Creative Commons
- Obama's Production Tweaks
- Clinton Successor Watch: RFK Jr.'s Facebook Group
- Daily Digest: Did the Internet Matter?
- Change.gov a Wiki Wannabe
- Daily Digest: Obama Looking Eager to Open 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
- Change.gov Starts to Go Interactive, Intensively
- It's Time for a Wiki White House
By Fred Stutzman, 10/15/2008 - 7:47am
A group of Obama supporters has crowdsourced the Fight the Smears campaign with a new website, Smearbusters.org. Using search engine results, the site compiles a list of smears ("Guilt-by-association with Ayers" is one, with 180 hits) and then brokers the smears to a team of volunteers. The idea is that the volunteer will go to the forum, blog comment thread, etc. and join in the discussion, providing counterbalance to the smear.
The mechanics of the site are fairly simple. A user is provided a link to a smear, and fact-based copy to address the allegation. A response to the Ayres smear includes:
William Ayers is a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, with whom Barack served on the board of an education-reform organization in the mid-1990's. According to the Associated Press, they are not close: "No evidence shows they were "pals" or even close when they worked on community boards years ago ..." (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93KD6Q00&show_article=1)
Smear groups and now the McCain campaign are trying to connect Obama to acts Ayers committed 40 years ago - when Barack was just eight years old. Here's what the New York Times reported on the connection (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html)
This effort is interesting on a number of fronts. While I'm fairly certain that such efforts won't win over bitter partisans, this site may play a role in a larger informational context. When people are searching for information on a candidate (or sent a link about a candidate), the presence of counterbalanced information may tone down the partisan rancor of a page. In a sense, this Smearbusters.org is taking the fight to Google, extending the pre-existing informational strategies of the campaign.
It should be noted that Smearbusters.org will need to proceed judiciously to avoid claims of astroturfing. For this reason, I think it is unlikely that we'd see a candidate-supported version of the site. Even so, it is not hard to imagine volunteer efforts like these popping up on both sides of the fence in future campaigns.
more from Fred Stutzman's blog | login or register to post comments

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Recent comments
1 hour 54 min ago
2 hours 11 min ago
8 hours 51 min ago
8 hours 53 min ago
8 hours 56 min ago
18 hours 53 min ago
2 days 3 hours ago
2 days 5 hours ago
2 days 23 hours ago
3 days 39 min ago