- Clocking Ticking on Replacing "Campaign-Trail Charades" with Useful Debate
- How Do the Candidates Rate on Tech? You Decide
- Changes at Change.org: A Media Hub for Social Action
- Daily Digest: Why '08 Will Be the Election of Databases (One Way or Another)
- Last-Minute Push for Reluctant Technologists to Embrace, Evangelize Obama
- Daily Digest: From Field to Felonies to Fine-Tuned Targeting
- Must-Read: Zack Exley on the "New Organizers"
- The Curious Case of Palin's Inbox
- Public Submitted Thousands of Debate Questions Online, Not Millions [Updated]
- Daily Digest: Was Last Night a Waste of 90 Minutes? Debatable
By Micah L. Sifry, 07/19/2007 - 12:22pm
If visits to a presidential candidate's website are indications of positive voter interest, then there are several things to be learned from some new data that Compete.com, the rapidly growing web analytics company, has just published:
-Voter interest in the Democratic field is a magnitude greater than voter interest in the Republican field. A glance at Compete's blog posts, which depict maps of the country with total visits to each candidate's site, the intensity of interest in the Democrats overall is clearly much stronger than in the Republicans. This confirms something we at techPresident been pointing out since January across such measures as blog posts mentioning the candidates by name (where the Ds lead the Rs two-to-one), or the number of friends the candidates are earning on social networking hubs, or the number of demands being expressed for them to come speak somewhere. It is a very good time to be a Democratic candidate for president of the United States.
-According to data that Compete.com provided to techPresident, the lion's share of unique visits coming from the early states of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina are flowing to the Democrats. For example, in terms of site visits from Iowans, 31% went to Edwards, 29% to Obama, and 24% to Clinton.

Site visits from New Hampshire residents focused on Clinton (35%) and Obama (33%).

The same two frontrunners lead in Nevada, though Edwards is doing pretty well there too.

Only in South Carolina does a Republican, Romney, break into the double digits compared to the top Democrats. In general, it should be noted, Romney has generated the most interest from web surfers seeking out Republican candidates.
-The same D vs. R trend is true in the mega-states of California and New York. Interestingly, Clinton edges past Obama in California:

While Clinton dominates in web visits from New Yorkers:
-If intensity matters more than individual visits, the field shifts somewhat, to the advantage of Obama on the Democratic side, while Romney continues to dominate among Republicans. According to additional data provided by Compete.com to techPresident, if you look at time spent on a candidate's site between January and June 2007, among the leading Democrats, Edwards is leading in the early state of Iowa, Clinton is leading in New Hampshire and South Carolina, and Obama in Nevada. but when it comes to uber-Tuesday, Obama is ahead in most of the big primary states like California, Texas, Florida, Illinois, and New Jersey, while Clinton is doing strongest in New York and Edwards in Ohio.
-Among the top Republicans, Romney is leading in New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, while Fred Thompson is leading in Iowa (this despite his late entry into the race). Romney is also ahead in most of the large states like California, Texas and Florida, while Giuliani leads in New York and Illinois.
Coming in a second post: how data for web trends from the month of June suggest some shifts in the overall pattern, and spell good news for some candidates...

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Recent comments
4 hours 13 min ago
12 hours 41 min ago
1 day 13 hours ago
3 days 23 hours ago
4 days 18 hours ago
4 days 19 hours ago
4 days 20 hours ago
4 days 20 hours ago
5 days 5 hours ago
5 days 10 hours ago