Daily Digest: 10/2/07
By Joshua Levy, 10/02/2007 - 11:34am

The Web on the Candidates

  • The New York Times’ Katherine Seelye has a sense that, even though there are more women than men online, more men than women are engaging with political websites. This presents a wrench in candidates’ web strategies. To get some answers about why women aren't more political online, Seelye solicited the opinions of her readers. In addition to the theory that men are happier spending time on the computer than helping with chores (for the record, I have no idea what she’s talking about…), many opinions point to the similarities between politics and sports, and that men “build up an echo chamber that reinforces their dominance.” These might be funny social observations, but they have a real political impact: if campaigns can't figure out how to engage women online, they're missing out on millions of potential eyeballs and, therefore, votes.

  • Supporters of Ron Paul have produced a website called Ron Paul Friends USA (imaginative title!) with a GOTV message. Their goal is to get volunteers on the ground to promote Paul, and they have a fairly sophisticated plan to do so. I’m curious why this group — which doesn’t say anything about itself other than it’s privately funded — isn’t working with the Paul campaign, given it’s emphasis on field organizing.

The Candidates on the Web

  • The entire Romney family (besides, er, Mitt) is now blogging. The five Romney sons blog at their Five Brothers blog, and now Mitt’s wife, Ann, has her own blog too. As Jose Antonio Vargas at the Washington Post notes, features include Ann’s Recipes, in which she shares the recipe for her mother’s Welsh Skillet Cakes (is that like a pancake?). I wonder if the blog, with it’s woman-centric focus, is a preemptive attempt to battle Hillary Clinton’s appeal to women…

  • The third-quarter fundraising numbers are starting to come in: Ron Paul has raised more than $3 million, which, as the Wall Street Journal’s Mary Jacoby notes, is more than Democrats Chris Dodd ($1.5 million) and Joe Biden (just under $2 million).

  • Barack Obama raised $20 million ($19 million for the primaries), and while this is less than the $32.5 million he raised last quarter, he has still raised four times as much as Howard Dean had at this point in 2003, and he has still received donations from an impressive 352,000 people, many of whom have donated small amounts over the Internet.

  • MyDD’s Jerome Armstrong points out that, while Obama has broken Dean’s record for the number of individual donors in a primary campaign, his growth has been slowing compared to previous quarters:

    Obama’s new donors:

    1st Q— 104,000

    2nd Q— 154,000

    3rd Q— 93,000

    Total— 350,000

    “In terms of momentum, I doubt that Obama will focus as much on gaining additional donors in Q4, and he’s already peaked on that end during Q2. Still, that represents alot of money, and alot of donors to draw on again, more than enough to allow Obama to fully contest every primary and caucus,” Armstrong wrote.

  • Although Hillary Clinton beat out Obama, raising $27 million ($22 million for the primaries), both candidates are about even when it comes to fundraising. “The bottom line remains that Clinton and Obama are in the same ballpark, with their rivals well behind,” writes the Politico’s Ben Smith.

  • John Edwards raised $7 million, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are said to have raised $10 million each, and Fred Thompson raised $8 million.

In Case You Missed It…

In the battle to send out the most human, personal emails possible, Hillary Clinton has struck a blow: she sent out an actual handwritten note.

The real Ron Paul grassroots sites

I’m curious why this group — which doesn’t say anything about itself other than it’s privately funded — isn’t working with the Paul campaign, given it’s emphasis on field organizing.

None of our grassroots groups "work with the campaign." We do almost all the field organizing independent of the campaign, although the campaign recently organized a massive canvassing operation in New Hampshire. Mostly, the official campaign tries to catch up on what we're doing.

Don't feel bad though, it's a common misperception that the Paul campaigning is somehow fielding and organizing a massive army, when the opposite is true.

This site you've picked to post about looks new. I've never seen it before and it has no content. If you want to look at established and active grassroots sites, go here: Ron Paul Forums or here: Daily Paul.

Why did you choose to highlight that site?

Not a Ron Paul site

Look what you get when you google this site.

Weird. Only a few conspiracy sites mention it. Did someone pitch this site to you?

Yes, they sent it to us

We get emails from campaigns and supporters all the time telling us what they're working on. We've discovered a lot of interesting stuff that way (hint, hint).

Give him credit- Ron Paul's ambitious.

The Paul campaign, blown away by the massive response to their last minute request for funds in the 3rd Quarter, have upped their goal. Their modest compaign goal of $500,000 was quickly replaced by a $1,000,000 goal, and amazingly they have managed to raise a full three times that number. All that money has gone to their head, and now their goal for this month is to raise $4 million. But skeptics postulate that he will be unable to maintain the current level of fundraising momentum until the beginning of January, when the first primaries are held.

Give Ron Paul some credit

Well, at least Ron Paul raised enough money this quarter to be semi-competitive in the Republican primaries. With the media atention this will give him, and how divided the Republican party is, he actually has about as much of a chance of winning the Republcan nomination as the Colorado Rockies do of making the playoffs. Oh, wait a minute, the Rockies DID make the major league baseball playoffs.



© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |