<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - 10Questions.com Complete and a Success!  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/18181/10questions_com_complete_and_a_success</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;10Questions.com Complete and a Success! &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Well done</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/18181/10questions_com_complete_and_a_success#comment-1629</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think this was a wonderful format, and entirely agree that it should be taken as a &quot;precedent-setting&quot; approach to things. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d just suggest a way to somehow make it work like a poll works, in terms of random samples of people who are asked to answer each question for each candidate. Otherwise you get people/supporters raiding the votes. Perhaps you could even have a &quot;general public&quot; vote, that wouldn&#039;t be done by the random sample, and then a more deliberate, controlled group of randomly selected people who would commit to answering some number of questions. The questions and answers take a little bit, so, with some effort, it seems it could be set up where a large randomly selected group of people are asked to participate and take 7-10 minutes to listen to one question and one answer by one candidate (any more than that and you&#039;d have to likely pay people to ensure they are listening to full questions and answers, but for this i bet people&#039;d be willing to actually listen to a full question and answer on a whole). So, that is, the randomly selected group could be split up so everyone just had one question and answer to listen to and vote on; you&#039;d just have to make sure you had a big enough group. I think that could legitimize this as a trustworthy poll, build up a lot of hype, and at the same time keep the public involved by allowing them to submit questions and vote. Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:58:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bhoconnor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1629 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>10Questions.com Complete and a Success! </title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/18181/10questions_com_complete_and_a_success</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The internet offers a better way to involve the public in evaluating our presidential debates, and because we&amp;#8217;ve wanted to improve upon attempts to incorporate it into that process, we launched 10Questions.com on Oct. 17, 2007.  Now, two and a half months later, the public has had the chance to rate the candidates’ responses to the top ten submitted questions and we are declaring 10Questions an unmitigated success&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/18181/10questions_com_complete_and_a_success&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/18181/10questions_com_complete_and_a_success#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.techpresident.com/techpres/10questions">10Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:19:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>the editors</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18181 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
