<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - Obama&amp;#039;s $40M - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/23613/obama_s_40m</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Obama&#039;s $40M&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Obama&#039;s $40M</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/23613/obama_s_40m</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As fundraising gets more and more transparent, it&#039;s important to learn how to read between the lines.&amp;nbsp;As&amp;nbsp;pathbreaking as the Obama campaign has been, they are a step back from the transparency of the Dean bat, which at least gave us real dollar figures in addition to a total number of donors.&amp;nbsp;Neither could beat the transparency gold standard set by Ron Paul, who updated via a real-time XML+Flash element that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com&quot;&gt;was scraped for analytics.&lt;/a&gt; Moreover, when the Paul campaign bulk uploaded offline contributions, they told people. The Obama &quot;bat&quot; turns out to be an indecipherable&amp;nbsp;mix of real and fake data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/23613/obama_s_40m&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/23613/obama_s_40m#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/6">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/84">fundraising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/169">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:23:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Ruffini</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23613 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
