<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - Collaborative (and Polite) Platform Crafting - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/27347/collaborative_and_polite_platform_crafting</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Collaborative (and Polite) Platform Crafting&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Innovative is relative</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/27347/collaborative_and_polite_platform_crafting#comment-2224</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Point taken, but when the starting point is having people write letters to party HQ to compete for a slot testifying in person before the platform committee, than opening it up at all is indeed shiny and new. Who should ultimately be crafting a party&#039;s platform is great question. But my sense from talking to people involved in the process is that the GOP policy committee was motivated by the useful idea of seeing what&#039;s bubbling up in the public realm; as I always say, openness is tricky, but the alternative isn&#039;t so great -- the last thing we want is where our elected leaders and their surrogates lag behind and become &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; closed off from the rest of the world than they already are. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:35:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nancy Scola</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2224 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is it just me...</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/27347/collaborative_and_polite_platform_crafting#comment-2223</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;..or is the &quot;new and innovated&quot; GOPPlatform2008.com platform crudely designed and really doesn&#039;t allow for any kind of deliberative groupware advancement towards a unified set of political goals? I suspect the only thing innovative is the RNC attempting anything along these lines in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, call me old fashion, but shouldn&#039;t establishing the political platform of the party be limited to registered Republicans?  Here again, I see party officials buying into the concept that the RNC should follow the political agenda of the day rather than leading the public on important issues of the day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lastly, allowing the general public access to the formation of the party&#039;s political platform doesn&#039;t seem to be a very effective way of solidifying its political base to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the RNC would like some helpful suggestions, they should start now and redesign this effort for the 2012 convention and limit access to ONLY registered Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ex animo&lt;br /&gt;
davidfarrar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://nolp.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;The National Online Party&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:04:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>davidfarrar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2223 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Collaborative (and Polite) Platform Crafting</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/27347/collaborative_and_polite_platform_crafting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gopplatform2008.com/intro.aspx&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3012/2669627768_e014926bd5.jpg?v=0&quot; width=&quot;175&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; class=&quot;flickr-photo&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I want to do take a longer look at something I briefly mentioned in today&#039;s Daily Digest but which deserves more consideration -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gopplatform2008.com/intro.aspx&quot;&gt;GOPPlatform2008.com&lt;/a&gt;. The Republican National Committee is calling it an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gopplatform2008.com/intro.aspx&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;historic online platform.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; Simply put, it&#039;s an innovative attempt to collaborative craft the GOP&#039;s manifesto before its convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul this September.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the past when our national political parties wanted to craft their platforms, the process was simple -- and, largely closed off from the political base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/27347/collaborative_and_polite_platform_crafting&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/27347/collaborative_and_polite_platform_crafting#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/15501">GOP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.techpresident.com/techpres/party_platform">party platform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:53:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nancy Scola</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27347 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
