<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - Don&amp;#039;t use candidates&amp;#039; websites if you want useful information - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/9416/don_t_use_candidates_websites_if_you_want_useful_information</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Don&#039;t use candidates&#039; websites if you want useful information&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;ve been saying this for months</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/9416/don_t_use_candidates_websites_if_you_want_useful_information#comment-1299</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The first time I heard about Howard Dean in 2003, I googled him and found his campaign website. I went right to the issues section and was blown away! This was not the usual careful political parsing I was used to. The positions I saw were clear and firm. They not only presented a stand, but an explanation. I felt respected as a citizen and made my first-ever political donation right there and then. The first of many.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This year, I have searched in vain for anything similar. Until recently, the Clinton site had no issues section at all. None. Only the Kucinich site had anything approaching what I saw on Dean&#039;s site in 2003. I was offended on several sites (John McCain was the worst with the big black page) to be presented with a big splash screen asking for donations before I&#039;d even entered the site. And even more offended when I saw what content-free zones the websites were.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know about the votes you mention. But only because I did my homework--not because candidates published their stands on these controversial issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You will probably not be surprised to hear that, this year, I have yet to decide on a candidate. I have not made any donations. I am not organizing and working, or planning to travel to multiple states to support anybody--all of which I did in 2003/2004. At the most basic level, it&#039;s because none of them have done me the courtesy to tell me who I&#039;d be supporting.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:15:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cfinnie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1299 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Political Base</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/9416/don_t_use_candidates_websites_if_you_want_useful_information#comment-1298</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Political Base, which I wrote about this morning, is doing a good job of comparisons, especially the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalbase.com/issues/&quot;&gt;issues&lt;/a&gt; section, which offers a really cool way to compare the candidates.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:17:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joshua Levy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1298 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t use candidates&#039; websites if you want useful information</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/9416/don_t_use_candidates_websites_if_you_want_useful_information</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The candidates&#039; websites don&#039;t seem to know about Iran.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/9416/don_t_use_candidates_websites_if_you_want_useful_information&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/9416/don_t_use_candidates_websites_if_you_want_useful_information#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:40:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zephyr Teachout</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9416 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
