<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - ABC - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/15351</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;ABC&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I honestly watched the</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/18573/thoughts_on_last_night_s_debates#comment-1627</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I honestly watched the debate with the laptop closed so I did not see what was happening on Facebook. I also watched it an hour later so the whole &quot;live&quot; thing didn&#039;t reach me anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that said I am curious about the makeup of the people watching. Did you get a sense of the politics of the people talking on Facebook? Because from the brief moments where Diane Sawyer was asking the girl watching the Interactive end, I had the impression it was an overwhelmingly liberal audience. The moment I chuckled at was when the woman reported that people online were disappointed that Republicans did not &quot;discuss the environment more&quot; or were not satisfied or something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking over the Facebook page now and it seems to pretty much be the very liberal Obama/Edwards/Ron Paul/Push John McCain as the Republican candidate crowd that takes over a great deal of the online discussion. If that is true I don&#039;t know exactly what tapping into this audience would have added.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:10:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jeff Commaroto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1627 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
