http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/16047 Comments for "staff" en http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/4203/gop_outgunned_3_1_on_new_media_staff#comment-965 <p>Nice work, Patrick! You must feel like the prophet who goes unheard in his own country. This understaffing, if it continues, could have a multiplier effect lasting for years, since each campaign will end up releasing fewer trained people into the overall pool of Republican talent. Think of the influence of the '04 Dean and Kerry people on the current online political landscape. More on this here:<br /> <a href="http://www.epolitics.com/2007/07/31/on-the-long-term-effects-of-republican-understaffing/" title="http://www.epolitics.com/2007/07/31/on-the-long-term-effects-of-republican-understaffing/">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/07/31/on-the-long-term-effects-of-republic...</a></p> <p>Colin Delany<br /> e.politics<br /> <a href="http://www.epolitics.com" title="http://www.epolitics.com">http://www.epolitics.com</a></p> Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:17:11 -0400 Colin Delany comment 965 at http://www.techpresident.com http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/4203/gop_outgunned_3_1_on_new_media_staff#comment-961 <p>It's interesting, Obama has spent the least online of the top candidates (<a href="http://www.thedailybackground.com/2007/07/30/which-candidates-are-spending-the-most-online/">a paltry $485,400 to Clinton's and Romney's $1M+</a>), but has raised the most online by far ($17M in the first and second Q combined). Is it possible that some of the candidates are spending money in new media expenditures in much less efficient ways than others?</p> <p><i>Check out my political blog, <a href="http://thedailybackground.com">TheDailyBackground.com</a></i></p> Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:16:58 -0400 Arlen comment 961 at http://www.techpresident.com