<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - Google bomb - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/184</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Google bomb&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The feedback won&#039;t be that different, but the outcome may be.</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/26122/hillary_goes_high_tech_in_non_concession_speech_solicits_online_endgame_input_did_she_go_underground_to_duck_ba#comment-2131</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;She&#039;ll receive a lot of messages from people telling her to stay in, and she&#039;ll receive a lot of messages asking her to step down, and she&#039;ll receive a lot of inflammatory notes that go straight into the trash.  I doubt much of it will be too different than what she&#039;s been receiving the past month or so.  (As Gary Hart&#039;s online director, I was privy to his inbox when he was deciding whether to run in &#039;04... the email gets predictable pretty quickly.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She&#039;ll raise some money, and it looks like there are some campaigns pushing her as VP choice for Obama.  She might receive suggestions as to whether she should stay in the Senate, go for a different post in the administration, take a hiatus, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The real question is how much the campaign is actually listening vs. just doing this to buy time.  They started out with an online announcement suggesting the campaign would be a &quot;conversation&quot;, so how does that conversation end?  James Carville noted on CNN last night that it takes time to figure these things out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:03:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sarah Granger</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2131 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
