<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - Habeus Corpus - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/techpres/habeus_corpus</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Habeus Corpus&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>This is a good evolution</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/7911/chris_dodd_s_habeus_corpus_site_calls_and_widgets#comment-1196</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m glad to see finally that a campaign is growing out of the reliance on the same old petition tools and citizen co-sponsor tricks that online political operatives have used for years to build their lists with diminishing returns.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When campaigns aren&#039;t using gimmicks or contests online, it&#039;s the &quot;advocacy&quot; that is most insulting.  Users know that most online advocacy tools from candidates are a blatant list build program, but it doesn&#039;t have to be that way - it could be like what Dodd has done here, which is actual activism. He&#039;s doing crowd sourcing and it&#039;s interactive and it&#039;s more effective than email spam and it&#039;s more open to users (it does not require login).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I understand that many internet operatives have been limited by the tools that they have been using, most of them are stuck with out-of-the-box turnkey solutions and so their tactics have not kept up with the public&#039;s growing sophistication about spammers and list building exploits.  So this subsite for Dodd is a great sign of things to come, I hope. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:00:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fred Gooltz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1196 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
