<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - Change.org - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/410</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Change.org&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A strange design decision by change.org</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/33271/daily_digest_questioning_the_marching_orders_construct#comment-2839</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Since yesterday, change.org got rid the list of top 10 user-rated ideas from their site, leaving the &quot;featured ideas&quot; (presumably chosen by change.org).  Yesterday we could see that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.change.org/ideas/view/get_fisa_right_repeal_the_patriot_act_and_restore_our_civil_liberties&quot;&gt;Get FISA Right, repeal the PATRIOT Act, and restore our civil liberties&lt;/a&gt; was up to #8; today there&#039;s no indication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I must be missing something here.  The whole point of the site is user feedback.  Why not recognize it?  And many of change.org&#039;s partners on this understand the value of transparency in other contexts ... why not here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jon -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://talesfromthe.net/jon&quot; title=&quot;http://talesfromthe.net/jon&quot;&gt;http://talesfromthe.net/jon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:57:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JonPincus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2839 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks, Micah</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/31390/changes_at_change_org_a_media_hub_for_social_action#comment-2658</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the write-up, Micah. Fair and honest; we would expect nothing less :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To your last point about being able to empower people to make real change through the site; you rightly point out that this is going to be one of our most difficult challenges and is something we&#039;re going to start putting a lot of effort into. As you mentioned, nobody has nailed this yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The one other thing I&#039;d say is that if we&#039;re a successful media outlet publishing revealing stories about topics rarely covered in such a sustained way - such as human trafficking, homelessness, or criminal justice - and thereby raising awareness and changing the conversation, that by itself could have significant impact. We&#039;re certainly not stopping there, but I think it&#039;s a solid foundation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks again,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:16:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brattray</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2658 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Boring organization</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/14824/a_change_org_is_gonna_come_to_your_non_profit_org#comment-1564</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;9 out of 10 organizations are worthless and are not doing much to help real people.  Change.org suffers from &quot;save the world&quot; syndrome. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 12:15:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Freedomfighter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1564 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
