<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - censorship - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/taxonomy/term/50</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;censorship&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>One thing they should</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/40/barack_runs_with_the_top_down#comment-4</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One thing they should consider implementing, IMHO, is giving their community the ability to flag things for administrative attention (they may already have done that, I haven&#039;t had time to really check the site out).  Flagging it takes the group offline until an admin can review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That helps them police objectionable content, and also keeps things from devolving to mob rule where people get flagged because someone else disagrees.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Raven Brooks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
