<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - superdelegates - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/techpres/superdelegates</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;superdelegates&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Obama and the Netroots</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/22401/daily_digest_does_obama_need_the_netroots#comment-1851</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s definitely true that Obama hasn&#039;t courted the Netroots, hasn&#039;t needed the Netroots, and if he wins tomorrow, won&#039;t need the Netroots moving forward. It&#039;s also true that his campaign has built a much more broad, and powerful, coalition than the Netroots can ever hope to be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the problem I see, as a partisan Democrat and a small-dollar donor to the Obama campaign, is that while Obama has positioned himself to take down the Clinton machine and obliterate McCain come November, he&#039;s not leaving behind any coattails behind for the hundreds, even thousands, of down-ticket Democrats that will be on the ballot with him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;True, it&#039;s still the primary season, and the Obama campaign has every right to focus on their candidate rather than the party. But at this point, they&#039;ve shown no hint that they at all care about party building if they were able to finally put down Clinton. Movement building? Definitely. Party building? Not so much.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:18:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Luigi Montanez</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1851 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;love&quot; and &quot;funny&quot; </title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/22401/daily_digest_does_obama_need_the_netroots#comment-1849</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;To be clear, I wrote that I &quot;love that name,&quot; not that it was funny.   But you&#039;re right that we shouldn&#039;t single out peoples&#039; names based on how where they come from. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, I don&#039;t think I questioned Mr. Tobaccowala&#039;s achievements or made fun of him; in fact, I called him an astute observer.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:50:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joshua Levy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1849 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>funny names</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/22401/daily_digest_does_obama_need_the_netroots#comment-1848</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not to be a killjoy, but I really see nothing funny about Mr. Tobaccowala&#039;s name.  If someone were named &quot;Baker&quot; or &quot;Shoemaker&quot; or &quot;Carpenter&quot; we wouldn&#039;t make fun of them.  But wait, those are European names, and Rishad is just a South Asian who has distinguished himself as a very smart and accomplished person in his industry.  So it&#039;s OK to make fun of him.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:47:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter Pasi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1848 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
