<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - TV - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/techpres/tv</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;TV&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Social Costs</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/33439/the_internet_is_tv_twitter_is_the_internet#comment-2993</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I fear that we&#039;re paying a price for technological innovations like Twitter. When I googled &quot;Internet social costs,&quot; the top result was &quot;Stanford: Internet charges a steep social cost&quot; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2005/02/21/daily28.html&quot; title=&quot;http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2005/02/21/daily28.html&quot;&gt;http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2005/02/21/daily28.html&lt;/a&gt;. Their finding that heavy Internet users spend much less time in face-to-face interaction with family members does not surprise me. I also suspect that the quality of that face time is also diminished, as people really listen to one another on a deep level less frequently. I&#039;m sorry, but the kind of superficial information conveyed on Twitter, and with most &quot;X is....&quot; postings on Facebook, does not interest me. I prefer more soulful connections, and if that is not possible, I accept my solitude. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If others have references to studies on the social costs of modern technology, I would welcome receiving them at wadehudson AT progressiveresourcecatolog DOT org.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:29:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wadehudson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2993 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
