<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.techpresident.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - collaborative government - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/techpres/collaborative_government</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;collaborative government&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Politics 2.0 is about communication, not information</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/24166/politicsweb2_0_on_the_future_of_government_in_the_digital_era#comment-1973</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, I think there&#039;s a big clash here between &quot;letting citizens do things&quot; and &quot;citizens wanting to do things&quot; - and the resources that each party thinks citizens need to achieve these. Central-driven initiatives often seem to focus on getting the information out to people - the key word is &quot;transparency&quot;. This stems fundamentally, I think, from a representative democratic perspective, but it jars with the latter notion - a more involved, more participatory democracy. Citizens that want to do things themselves (rather than *know* things that other people are up to) don&#039;t want information, they want communication. The difference is between what people say, and how they say it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UK politics is almost in the same situation that the &quot;traditional&quot; record companies are in. Listeners don&#039;t want to just buy music, they want to recommend it, move it from place to place, chop it up and remix it. In the same way, citizens don&#039;t just want to know what the government is up to - they want to take the information, personalise it, swap it with each other, use it for their own goals, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the government doesn&#039;t get this, then it *will* become redundant. Communications will route around it. New forms of local number-crunching and info-sharing will make centralised data &quot;supplemental&quot; at best, and &quot;irrelevant&quot; at worst - information depends entirely on what people need it for, and getting stuff done with fuzzy data is far better than being paralysed by too much data.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scribe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1973 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>spot on</title>
 <link>http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/24166/politicsweb2_0_on_the_future_of_government_in_the_digital_era#comment-1971</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fascinating to hear your take. This was the point I laughed out loud:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;DirectGov and BusinessLink ... Both have low brand recognition and problems competing with other sources.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;she&#039;s 100% right about young people and I almost said hallelujah! praise her! out loud at the rest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;you don&#039;t know the half of it being inside the monster, Micah ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulcanning.me.uk&quot; title=&quot;www.paulcanning.me.uk&quot;&gt;www.paulcanning.me.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
web stuff and other ramblings&lt;br /&gt;
~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:48:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>paulcanning</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1971 at http://www.techpresident.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
