- About that Rebuild...
- Bridging another Digital Divide: Local races and DLCCWeb
- Defense Department Voting Assistance Program Draws Congressional Fire
- Daily Digest: Obama as Clinton Redux, in More Ways Than One
- Change.gov Swaps Traditional Copyright for Creative Commons
- Obama's Production Tweaks
- Clinton Successor Watch: RFK Jr.'s Facebook Group
- Daily Digest: Did the Internet Matter?
- Change.gov a Wiki Wannabe
- Daily Digest: Obama Looking Eager to Open 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
By Nancy Scola, 05/14/2007 - 10:42am
There are two competing trends in online social technologies. One is that everyone from presidential candidates to up-and-coming musicians are scrambling to master MySpace, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter. Along the way, they're embracing a new openness that sees value in the networked public sphere. The second is that everyone from the U.S. military to universities are rushing to control the tools that those over whom they have dominion -- from soldiers to swimmers -- use to express themselves online. The Army is both cracking down on milbloggers and YouTubers, citing security and bandwidth; college administrators are banning athletes from Facebook, citing threats to school reputation.
The question for political candidates and political leaders in my mind becomes: you're willing to exploit the enormous potential of new social technologies to further your agendas, but are you willing to stand up for the right of the people you lead to use them?

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Recent comments
4 hours 56 min ago
5 hours 13 min ago
11 hours 53 min ago
11 hours 55 min ago
11 hours 58 min ago
21 hours 55 min ago
2 days 6 hours ago
2 days 8 hours ago
3 days 2 hours ago
3 days 3 hours ago