- Daily Digest: How to Drink from a Firehose (and Know the Election's Winners, to Boot)
- McCain vs Obama: How the Meta-Data Stacks Up
- Clocking Ticking on Replacing "Campaign-Trail Charades" with Useful Debate
- How Do the Candidates Rate on Tech? You Decide
- Changes at Change.org: A Media Hub for Social Action
- Daily Digest: Why '08 Will Be the Election of Databases (One Way or Another)
- Last-Minute Push for Reluctant Technologists to Embrace, Evangelize Obama
- Daily Digest: From Field to Felonies to Fine-Tuned Targeting
- Must-Read: Zack Exley on the "New Organizers"
- The Curious Case of Palin's Inbox
I've been on the road since Thursday, first at a working meeting of the Sunlight Foundation in DC with people working on collaborative governance web designing, and then yesterday in Minneapolis at the National Conference on Media Reform (NCMR), where I moderated a panel on the same topic, and today in Houston at a miniconference at the Baker Institute on the internet and politics. A couple of times over the last two days, I managed to pull out the N95 and shot a couple of fun, Qik videos with some of the folks I bumped into at NCMR. Check out Jane Hamsher, Susan Crawford, Robert Greenwald, Deanna Zandt, Craig Newmark and Tom Steinberg.
login or register to post comments | Read more ...The Web on the Candidates
A commenter on Jeff Jarvis' Buzzmachine says that "there's a big elephant in the room on viral video for politics," which is that as more political advertising (and eyeballs) end up on YouTube, local broadcast stations will lose their most cherished sources of funding, similar to the way Craigslist has challenged newspapers' classified ads model. The dominant advertising mode is still TV, Jarvis writes, but it won't be that way forever: "All political advertising won’t migrate online yet because the audience on broadcast is bigger and campaigns are inherently conservative. But there will be a point of no return."
James Kotecki's new video takes a look at the most popular videos on YouTube that feature politicians doing or saying something stupid. He isn't sure that, in the end, these assorted "macaca" moments will ultimately affect the race, since the more we record candidates' every move, the more likely they'll get caught making gaffes, and we'll become used to the idea that candidates make mistakes. Kotecki ends with a sorta-funny montage of his own "gaffes."
login or register to post comments | Read more ...
Recent comments
1 hour 59 min ago
1 day 8 hours ago
1 day 16 hours ago
2 days 17 hours ago
5 days 3 hours ago
5 days 22 hours ago
5 days 23 hours ago
6 days 31 min ago
6 days 38 min ago
6 days 9 hours ago